Blackout

 I get that it was disappointing to all, but doesn't page upon pages of completely redacted evidence just fucking spell "guilty"? Sure, it doesn't delineate who is guilty (not officially) but, then again, it does! That is because, we all know who dunnit. We have pretty good knowledge of other guilty parties involved as well. Aside from the current President, other men involved were captains of industry, politics and even a legal scholar. Little Mike Johnson (spokesgremlin for the current regime) somehow feels these men need to be protected, that just because they were there, doesn't mean they were there. Maybe so, but who is he to be the guardian of guilt or innocence? I mean, was he there? 

We know who all the suspects are. Boatloads of black ink certainly are not going to exonerate them. You could hope that Noam "NOAM!" Chomsky was an innocent visitor, but not if he's as redacted as the others. Apparently 11 pages of Bill Clinton were fit to print, but when it seems like the implication is supposed to be that he teamed up with Michael Jackson and Dianna Ross(!!) to molest what turned out to be her kids, you have to take that with a grain of salt. 

This regime treats the world as if it's as dense and gullible as their own base. This regime is absolutely no smarter than its average Facebook foot soldier. We have seen them post for years crap that amounts to: "Nice little Bill Clinton youse got there. Be a shame if something happened to him because youse sad, Trump Derangement Syndrome caused youse to bring him down in youse ill-advised attempt to dethrone the greatest president in the history of the world... Capiche?" Well, words to that effect as your average Trump magat probably doesn't talk like a Brooklyn mobster. But youse probably get my drift.

I don't know anybody who wants to protect Bill Clinton if he's guilty of anything. Liberals, democrats- we're not like that with him or any other of our presidents. Guilty is as guilty does and so is innocence. We are not a cult. If the regime actually is trying to push it all off on Clinton, 11 pages of innocuous photos isn't going to get it. Blacked out text doesn't help either. Why would his crimes be blacked out?

It's nice, I suppose, that Pam Bondi et al recognize that, outside of their own circle, sex with minor children is frowned upon by most of the world, most of which already know how guilty Trump is. We all also seem to realize that he could admit it and get away with it. He managed to become POTUS- twice(!!) even though his own activities and words showed him to be a felonious cretin. He proves that every day, even as we speak. And nothing is done about it. No one ever on the planet has had so much Teflon bestowed upon him, for no good reason. Personally, this is what frosts me the most. Not a fucking thing will be done to him no matter how clearly his guilt will be proven. That frustrates us all. Any clear-thinking human on the planet sees his insanity and guilt for crimes committed largely when he was not identifiably senile as very serious transgressions. He's responsible for his deeds then regardless of his current (worsening) mental health. Yet we all know- not too deep down inside- he'll get away with it all. His own death and his handlers will see to that. God damn them all.